loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Read the sentence below about the Chicago fire of 1871. Which revision is the best example of adding concrete detail? Many people tried very hard to save the bu
PLS HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
Gracie can iron 3 shirts in 13 minutes. At this rate, how long will it take her to iron 10 shirts? Which proportion shows how to solve the problem?
Distance between -18 and -4
How important is the idea of fear in Colonial writing?
Why were the Magna Carta and English Bill of Rights created and what rights do they protect?
"Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disorder. Define what a genetic disorder is? Can you name two other genetic disorders?"
What type of literary work does The Devil's Dictionary most clearly exemplify?
Why do you think soccer is an important sport?
Which of the following is a false statement about health savings accounts (HSAs)?a. HSAs are available to any taxpayer using a health plan purchased through the