sariyawashere
sariyawashere sariyawashere
  • 04-06-2020
  • Social Studies
contestada

Question:
According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or
unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?​

Respuesta :

sindlea
sindlea sindlea
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

Answer Link
kassidyjenna2014 kassidyjenna2014
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:unconstitutional

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which shows 5.45 written as a mixed number?
You are conducting an experiment with phosphorus and nitrogen being added to the soil of a growing plant. When the amount of added nitrogen is increased, the
which number is 100 less than 38 tens
Why can't plants and animals use the nitrogen directly from the atmosphere? Answer A.There is not enough of it in the air. B.Nitrogen gas contains the element i
What is/was the American dream? I need at least 10 bullet points about what the American dream was please somebody help me
It is likely that Earth could lose half of its species in the next ____________ years. a. 50 b. 100 c. 500 d. 1000
How did professors feelings about black well as a student change over time?
which accurately describes a tangent
it is asking me to insert parentasies
What does el muslo mean?